Abstracts
22 September 2025
Vol. 2 No. s1 (2025): 48th National Conference of the Italian Association for the Study of Pain

BREAKTHROUGH CANCER PAIN, NEUROPATHIC PAIN FEATURES, AND OLDER AGE GREATLY INFLUENCE TELEMEDICINE-BASED FOLLOW-UP INTENSITY FOR CANCER PAIN MANAGEMENT

D. Esposito1, S. Romano1, M. Montedoro1, S. De Angelis1, G. Izzo1, V. Cerrone1, M.P. Bruno1, F. Monaco2, M. Cascella1 | 1Oncology, Ruggi Hospital, Salerno; 2ASL Napoli 1, Napoli

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
29
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

BACKGROUND
Cancer-related pain is a prevalent and debilitating symptom that significantly affects patients’ quality of life. Investigations demonstrated that the use of telemedicine management represents an effective strategy1,2.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the clinical characteristics, pain profiles, pharmacological treatments, and patients’ features influenzing follow-up intensity of telemedicine consultations for pain control at the Ruggi Hospital (Salerno, Italy).
METHODS
A retrospective observational analysis was conducted on 126 cancer patients receiving telemedicine-based pain care between November 2023 and July 2024. Data on demographics, pain characteristics (intensity, type), diagnosis, treatments, and number of teleconsultations were collected.
RESULTS
Of 126 patients, 97 (77%) underwent multiple telemedicine visits (mean: 3.2 per patient; some ≥6). Mean age was 68 years (range: 41–89); 54% were female. ECOG performance status: 21% ECOG 1, 47% ECOG 2, 26% ECOG 3, 6% ECOG 4. Tumor types: breast (25%), lung (18%), colorectal (14%), pancreatic (10%), gastric (8%), prostate (7%), others (18%). Pain types: nociceptive (48%), neuropathic (22%), mixed (30%). Pain sites: multisite (38%), back (22%), limbs (16%), abdomen (12%), pelvic/perianal (8%), head/neck (4%).BTcP was reported in 62%, and rapid-onset opioids (ROOs) were used by 58%. BTcP patients had more televisits (mean: 3.8 vs. 2.1). Neuropathic pain patients averaged 3.6 televisits; mixed pain 3.4; nociceptive pain 2.3. Patients with ECOG 3–4 had more follow-ups (mean: 3.5 vs. 2.7 for ECOG 1–2). Multisite pain was linked to more visits (3.7 vs. 2.5 in localized pain).
CONCLUSIONS
Telemedicine is effective for cancer pain management, enabling individualized care. Patients with BTcP, neuropathic or multisite pain, older age, or worse functional status needed more frequent remote monitoring. These findings support the integration of telemedicine into oncologic pain care pathways.


Figure 1. Average number of telemedicine visits by patient characteristics.


Table 1. Multivariate linear regression identified factors significantly influencing the number of televisits per patient. Age, ECOG status, bone metastases, BTcP, ROOs, and antiepileptics were positively associated. Gender, diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease were not significant.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Perez J, Niburski K, Stoopler M, Ingelmo P. Telehealth and chronic pain management from rapid adaptation to long-term implementation in pain medicine: A narrative review. Pain Rep. 2021 Mar 9;6(1):e912. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000912.
2. Buonanno P, Marra A, Iacovazzo C, Franco M, De Simone S. Telemedicine in Cancer Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Med. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):226-233. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac128.

How to Cite



1.
BREAKTHROUGH CANCER PAIN, NEUROPATHIC PAIN FEATURES, AND OLDER AGE GREATLY INFLUENCE TELEMEDICINE-BASED FOLLOW-UP INTENSITY FOR CANCER PAIN MANAGEMENT: D. Esposito1, S. Romano1, M. Montedoro1, S. De Angelis1, G. Izzo1, V. Cerrone1, M.P. Bruno1, F. Monaco2, M. Cascella1 | 1Oncology, Ruggi Hospital, Salerno; 2ASL Napoli 1, Napoli. Adv Health Res [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 22 [cited 2025 Oct. 14];2(s1). Available from: https://www.ahr-journal.org/site/article/view/63