Abstracts
22 September 2025
Vol. 2 No. s1 (2025): 48th National Conference of the Italian Association for the Study of Pain

EFFICACY OF DORSAL ROOT GANGLION STIMULATION AFTER FAILURE OF SPINAL CORD STIMULATION IN PERSISTENT SPINAL PAIN SYNDROME TYPE 2: A CASE REPORT

S. Zappalà1, S. Stimolo1, G. Ruggieri1, A. Spina2, S. Caramma1 | 1Pain Center, Catania; 2Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, “G. Rodolico-S. Marco” University Hospital, Catania

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
13
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

INTRODUCTION
Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome type 2 (PSPS2), previously referred to as Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS), is a challenging and disabling condition affecting patients with chronic pain that is caused or worsened by spinal surgery. In cases where conventional Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) fails, Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation (DRG-S) offers a more targeted and potentially more effective approach, directly modulating the sensory neurons responsible for pain transmission.
METHODS
The patient was a 56-year-old male with PSPS2 and right-sided L5-S1 radiculopathy. He had previously undergone microdiscectomy, L4-L5 spinal fusion, and two failed SCS trials (conventional and high-frequency). In 2025, at the UOSD pain therapy of the San Marco Hospital in Catania he was selected for DRG-S implantation at the right L5-S1 level. During a 10-day trial at 20 Hz, the patient experienced >50% pain relief. After a short washout, stimulation was reduced to 4 Hz with increased clinical benefit. Assessments were carried out at T0 (pre-op), T1 (1 month), T2 (3 months), and T3 (6 months), using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and Short Form Health Survey (SF-12, PCS and MCS).
RESULTS
The patient’s pain level decreased from NRS 9 to 3, ODI improved from 70% to 20%, and PGIC reached 70%. SF-12 scores also improved markedly: PCS-12 from 19.6 to 34.7, and MCS-12 from 36.6 to 45.6. All improvements remained stable through the six-month follow-up, even with low-frequency stimulation, suggesting consistent therapeutic benefit.
CONCLUSIONS DRG-S proved effective as a rescue therapy for PSPS2 with associated radiculopathy, resulting in sustained pain relief and functional improvement. Its localized mechanism offers potential advantages over traditional SCS. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm and expand upon these promising findings.

 

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Chapman KB, Spiegel MA, van Helmond N, et al. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as a Salvage Therapy Following Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2022 Oct;25(7):1024-1032.
2. Deer TR, Pope JE, Petersen EA, et al. An Evidence-Based Consensus for the Use of Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Non-Surgical Low Back Pain: The NEURON Group. J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 14;18:1247-1274.
3. Tabatabaei P, Salomonsson J, Kakas P, Eriksson M. Bilateral T12 Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Treatment of Low Back Pain With 20-Hz and 4-Hz Stimulation, a Retrospective Study. Neuromodulation. 2024 Jan;27(1):141-150.
4. Tabatabaei P, Kakas P, Bredemo L, Salomonsson J. Low-frequency dorsal root stimulation is effective for various pain etiologies and pain locations. Pain Pract. 2024 Nov;24(8):997-1004.

How to Cite



1.
EFFICACY OF DORSAL ROOT GANGLION STIMULATION AFTER FAILURE OF SPINAL CORD STIMULATION IN PERSISTENT SPINAL PAIN SYNDROME TYPE 2: A CASE REPORT: S. Zappalà1, S. Stimolo1, G. Ruggieri1, A. Spina2, S. Caramma1 | 1Pain Center, Catania; 2Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, “G. Rodolico-S. Marco” University Hospital, Catania. Adv Health Res [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 22 [cited 2025 Oct. 14];2(s1). Available from: https://www.ahr-journal.org/site/article/view/120